FANDOM

7,670 Pages

(Created page with "Dude, I don't object anything. My point in previous post is that "just" because something is "logical" doesn't mean it's "valid". We've seen too many "logically correct" junk ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Dude, I don't object anything. My point in previous post is that "just" because something is "logical" doesn't mean it's "valid". We've seen too many "logically correct" junk already, remember the infamous Punishment Gundam? The idea behind that thing does make sense in term of logic, doesn't mean it's something worth to include on this wiki at all.
+
Dude, I don't object anything. My point in previous post is that just because something is logical "alone" doesn't mean it's "valid". We've seen too many "logically correct" junk already, remember the infamous Punishment Gundam? The idea behind that thing does make sense in term of logic, doesn't mean it's something worth to include on this wiki at all.
   
 
You found a citable source now so it's well and good (even if I still like calling it Alliance more).
 
You found a citable source now so it's well and good (even if I still like calling it Alliance more).

Latest revision as of 17:32, July 1, 2016

Dude, I don't object anything. My point in previous post is that just because something is logical "alone" doesn't mean it's "valid". We've seen too many "logically correct" junk already, remember the infamous Punishment Gundam? The idea behind that thing does make sense in term of logic, doesn't mean it's something worth to include on this wiki at all.

You found a citable source now so it's well and good (even if I still like calling it Alliance more).

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.