FANDOM

7,683 Pages

  • Falloutghoul: I haven't seen you around so I presume you don't know me; I'm one of the admins of this site. Please don't adjust nor revert my editions unless you can confirm grammatical and/or conflicts with the articles I touch. I helped contribute the current aesthetics of the pages and if you noticed, I've been trying to create a standard arrangement with the pages. However, people continue to touch my editions thinking they're "fixing things." I primarily swim around the 00 Gundam pages; if you notice anything wrong, please talk to me first. Thanks for your consideration. Taikage (talk) 07:50, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • I have actually been around for a little while now and contributed to various pages, and I respect your position as an administrator.

      However, I feel that the Armaments, Special Equipment & Features, and Variants sections shouldn't have to be sub-sections of the Technology & Combat Characteristics sections.

        Loading editor
    • What falls under "Technology & Combat Characteristics?" If you really think about it, Weapons, and System Features also fall under that category doesn't it? It's like you're doing a whole subject on Sleeping, but you decide that Narcolepsy (random sleeping) is outside vs inside that area. The same logic applies here.

      Taikage (talk) 18:07, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, but then we would have to change everything, and its just easier to keep everything separated. Besides, were doing this based on looks more then categorizing.

        Loading editor
    • I agree with Dav7d2.

        Loading editor
    • Guys: I never said I required you nor anyone to follow through what I'm doing; just don't interfere and I'm happy enough. I'm giving the 00 pages a major overhaul by one edition at a time. Since the Gundams are the most popularly focused, that's what I'll be working on when I have time.

      If you guys haven't noticed, I've asked with the community many times to help write better articles as the structures often are fragmented and poorly written; nobody really pitched in. If anything, they only seem to jump on me when I write something, but won't help complete it themselves. Regardless of the arrangement of things, I'm here to bring some order to things. I just hope I can finish the majority of the editions by 15 yrs. Thanks for your time.

      Taikage (talk) 04:38, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Yes, but we can't just make those changes just to the 00 articles, they would have to be in unison throughout the Wikia.

        Loading editor
    • Dav7d2: I never expected the arrangement to be law within the G-Wikia grounds to begin with; I don't expect the pages to be in unison. Unless the aesthetics are absolute, I just made it this way because I feel it's more organized this way. However, should the community feel differently, I go with the consensus. I always respected the majority of the community's wishes. At this point though, things have gone my way because the community agreed and/or didn't feel bothered by it to act. Either way, as much as I would like my methods to be absolute, nothing I do will eternally remain. For better or worse, someone will always come along and change things. Until then, I'm doing my best to give a good presentation to our readers.

      Taikage (talk) 06:08, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.