Talk: Jotunheim

Revision as of 13:42, 15 May 2014

"Class?" Need a source

Although changed a while ago, there is nothing to support the claim that the Jotunheim is the namesake for this particular class of ships. None of the data info books list it as such. This needs to be reverted back to just "Jotunheim". You can even look on the official website which has 級 (class) listed for everything else but the Jotunheim. Deackychu (talk) 19:47, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

There's the Jotunheim and the Muspelheim, both are the same ships in their class, and we'll refer to them as a class. --Falloutghoul (talk) 23:43, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

I think you're missing the point here... the Jotunheim and Muspelheim are merely the names of the ships. They're the same "type" of ship, however we don't know what their class is. For example, if a Salamis-class ship was named Pasadena, yet we weren't given the offical designation of Salamis just yet, we wouldn't go around calling it the Pasadena-class. Do you follow what I'm saying? They're converted civilian ships and that is all we know. Therefore, "-class" should be removed from the title and it should just say "Jotunheim" as it is factually incorrect... unless you'd like to keep it that way and just keep spreading further misinformation to the masses. Deackychu (talk) 00:09, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:20, 15 May 2014 (view source) Gaeaman788 (Message Wall \| contribs) m (Gaeaman788 moved page Talk:Jotunheim-class to Talk:Jotunheim without leaving a redirect) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:42, 15 May 2014 (view source) Falloutghoul (Message Wall \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:There's the Jotunheim and the Muspelheim, both are the same ships in their class, and we'll refer to them as a class. --[[User:Falloutghoul\|Falloutghoul]] ([[User talk:Falloutghoul\|talk]]) 23:43, May 14, 2014 (UTC)		:There's the Jotunheim and the Muspelheim, both are the same ships in their class, and we'll refer to them as a class. --[[User:Falloutghoul\|Falloutghoul]] ([[User talk:Falloutghoul\|talk]]) 23:43, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

−	:::I think you're missing the point here... the ''Jotunheim'' and ''Muspelheim'' are merely the names of the ships. They're the same "type" of ship, however we don't know what their class is. For example, if a Salamis-class ship was named ''Pasadena'', yet we weren't given the offical designation of Salamis just yet, we wouldn't go around calling it the ''Pasadena''-class. Do you follow what I'm saying? They're converted civilian ships and that is all we know. Therefore, "-class" should be removed from the title and it should just say "''Jotunheim''" as it is factually incorrect... unless you'd like to keep it that way and just keep spreading further misinformation to the masses. [[User:Deackychu\|Deackychu]] ([[User talk:Deackychu\|talk]]) 00:09, May 15, 2014 (UTC)	+	::I think you're missing the point here... the ''Jotunheim'' and ''Muspelheim'' are merely the names of the ships. They're the same "type" of ship, however we don't know what their class is. For example, if a Salamis-class ship was named ''Pasadena'', yet we weren't given the offical designation of Salamis just yet, we wouldn't go around calling it the ''Pasadena''-class. Do you follow what I'm saying? They're converted civilian ships and that is all we know. Therefore, "-class" should be removed from the title and it should just say "''Jotunheim''" as it is factually incorrect... unless you'd like to keep it that way and just keep spreading further misinformation to the masses. [[User:Deackychu\|Deackychu]] ([[User talk:Deackychu\|talk]]) 00:09, May 15, 2014 (UTC)