FANDOM

7,528 Pages

Union Corporation?

Guys, I don't know much about this since I haven't heard about this at all. Anyone can back this up as legit or it's just another page to delete? Taikage - Admin of Gundam Wikia, but no pay check T_T 05:58, December 15, 2010 (UTC)

In the Gundam 00 Movie, there was a group called Union Corporation (or Colony Corporation) that sent that yellow GNX-XIII on Marina Ismail and Shirin Bakhtiar at the start of the film. Not much else is known about them, but since they are an independent faction, regardless of size or importance they deserve their own page. Think Tamil Tigers or La Eden here. Flag Meister 20:43, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Uhmm no. They have to be important and/or a big organization to deserve a page. Tamil Tigers are important in connection to real life and La Eden is a big terrorist group in 00. --Bronx01 21:58, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Well movie spoilers warning tag "just in case".

They're a big organisation actually since they're in charge of constructing colonies. The reason Marina came to see them was to petition for better conditions for the workers, and if I recall some sort of plea to allow them to see their families or something. They're not happy with the ESF putting their noses in their business so they sent the GN-X IIIs to kill Marina's ship as well as a worker to kill her directly inside the ship. Setsuna and Lockon stopped both attempts; Setsuna in the mobile suit department with the CB Flag, Lockon in the on foot department since he was already planted inside the ship. -SonicSP 10:29, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Rename

I'm thinking we should add the name of the series where this CPC comes from at the end in order to differentiate it from the one in UC[1]. Thoughts?--Observer Supreme 02:08, May 1, 2015 (UTC)

If there's already one, then yeah we should do it. -SuperSonicSP (talk) 10:38, May 1, 2015 (UTC)

There's no article for the UC CPC, so I'd say we can leave it as is--Gaeaman788 (talk) 15:23, May 1, 2015 (UTC)

Maybe, but I think it would be more exact that way. Besides, we can always put an "for other uses" thing at the top like some wikis do with articles that share ties in name or whatever.--Observer Supreme 20:09, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
Personally I think we should put it in because it's more precise. Not many people are going to confuse the two but there aren't much downsides to putting the specification. -SuperSonicSP (talk) 01:11, May 2, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.