User talk:Bronx01/Archive 1

Welcome
Hi, welcome to The Gundam Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the CB-0000G/C Reborns Gundam/Reborns Cannon page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- CatherineMunro (Talk) 17:04, January 29, 2010

About Allelujah
Bronx, when an opposing force attacks before the other force can properly respond, by dictionary definition, it's a preemptive strike, why do you keep changing it back? Wasabi 21:43, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

About your recent edits
Bronx01: I don't know what's going on with you, but your recent edits have dropped in quality, in fact, it's quite sloppy. Is everything alright? Please double check your grammar. Wasabi 13:30, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

System features in 00 Raiser
May I ask why you added the explanations to the system features section of the 00 Raiser page? All that material is discussed in depth in the pages dedicated to those subjects and they are linked not only in the body of the article but in the infobox as well.--Nkuzmik 13:01, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Archer Arios
Proof? Ok. http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/GNR-101A_GN_Archer - GN Archer. Marie's unit. http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/GN-007_Arios_Gundam - Arios. Alleluya's unit.

And "GN-007 + GNR-101A Archer" = "Archer Arios". "+" here is not for nothing. Use your brain please. -- Rimus 17:29, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Not enough? Look here Talk:GN-007 Arios Gundam -- Rimus 17:43, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad that we understood each other. -- Rimus 18:33, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Defense Rod
Japanese Wikipedia article on 00 MS has entry for defense rod under Union Flag's armaments

''ディフェンスロッド - 左腕の防御装備. 回転するローターに適切な傾斜角で敵弾を着弾させ跳弾させる. '''また、周囲にプラズマフィールドを展開することも可能. '''空戦機の観点から、重量負担の大きい通常のシールドを装備出来ない機体のために用意された. '' Kuruni 07:08, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

I realize that the source is Japanese, but the majority of users on this wiki don't speak or read Japanese. --Nkuzmik 18:43, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

hi all. read through this thing. it say something like:

defense rod. defense armament mounted on left forearm. deflects bullets with a rotary mechanism. able to generate a plasma field. because of the weight of a shield, designers opted for this lightweight design to suit the aerial combat role of the flag.

Help with Incomplete Profiles
Bronx01: You're doing a fantastic job with the profiles and I wanted to ask can you help complete the other profiles? Ever-since I found work, I no longer have the time to do in depth edits anymore. I still drop in to do minor stuff, but for the most part, it's all yours until I'm free from my job. Because Graham and Billy have some common history, I was working on those, including Feldt, Saji and Louise. Tell me what you think, thanks for your time. Wasabi 16:52, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll look at them and see what I can add. --Bronx01 17:51, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

About Beside Pain and Leif
Hey man, great job on the edits. I'm sure you noticed that Beside and Leif have 2 separate pages and when I asked earlier about it with other editors, they agreed with me to merge the two pages into one, that's why Leif's page also covers about Beside Pain, however I noticed you continue to edit the page that was meant to be deleted. Do you want to re-open and keep the Beside Pain page?

Wasabi 12:41, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Raphael-Plutone Rifle
I can understand why you deleted it, however, I did not add it without reason to suggest the connection. If you look at the weapon that the Plutone is equiped with, and the one by the Raphael, they are very close in appearance. Also, I read one of the gallery images on the 00 Gundam Seven Sword/G page, noting that the late Fereshte group was able to secure various parts from their former supply bases when they were discovered by the UN. Fereshte was also known to operate the Plutone and with it's disbandment, the weaponry of the Plutone was likely part of the supplies. Question, because we never see the weapon fire, and becasue of its size, how do we know/state that it is a bazooka-type weapon? It looks far to small to have that kind of fire power, and although the 00 Raiser is the exception, it had the Twin Drive for that, Raphael dose not. Another connection I noted before writing the article, is that the Plutone was the predecessor unit to the Inovade line of mobile suits (GRM Gundam to Gadessa, Garazzo, Gaddess), particularly the Virtue-Seravee line, from which the Raphael is the Successor unit to. While I can agree that no offical statement linking the Plutones rifle to the one held by Raphael has been made, there is lots of reasons while it could be the case. P.S., once you read this, you can delete the images if they are a distraction, and thank you for your time. 06:49, June 1, 2010 (UTC)Totem

Gundam SEED article
The reason why I said SEED was a lot more darker and bloodier compared to other series in Gundam aside from Victory was the nature of the death. Unlike Victory where some deaths had that "Newtype Death effects", most if not all of the deaths in CE Gundam was brutal and unpleasant compared to other series. The Cyclops and Genesis weapons are a lot more brutal with their execution than their cousin series. Gyrobot 04:53, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * The nature of death is the same with others, if I remember correctly. The thing is, if people felt more attached to characters, people think it's more brutal. But to compare it seriously, it shouldn't be that much brutal or bloodier than other series. Bronx01 01:47, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * You could say that the deaths are visually more violent than it's previous seasons, Victory's moments could not hold a candle to the amount of brutality that SEED and Destiny had to offer. And SEED so far is the most violent series of AU gundam Gyrobot 21:14, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

About Masurao & Susanowo
Why did you change the art in the infobox? I'm not tying to pick a fight, I just don't remember a discussion about it. —AscendedAlteran 09:54, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Bronx, up until this point i always encouraged and supported your editions, but I'm perplexed as to your reasons behind changing the art pics of both Susanwoo and Masurao. The CG artist that made the pic of those two made an accurate depiction. If you're telling me there's a mistake or something missing to the pic, I'll give you that and let the magazine art pic stay, but if you're argument is simply that it's fan art, then I'll have to disagree with you. I believe the best pic should represent the pages and even if it's fan art, it's damn good art and better reflects the page in detail. I'm not going to have an edit war of this either, if the majority of the other editors side with either your or my argument, that's going to be the final decision with things. Tell me what you think.

Wasabi 17:33, July 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * The reason I changed them is because I disagree that the CGs have accurate depiction of Susanowo and Masurao. I pointed out the problem in Masurao page a week ago; it's same problem with Susanowo. I don't have any problem if its just a CG, but when it goes its own way from what Bandai had presented its "mobile suit", I rather feel disturbed. Here's the link to the discussion I made (here)


 * Also some Susanowo image scale models to compare
 * Robor Damashii
 * HG 1/144
 * Bronx01 13:17, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

I, personally, don't see a difference between the two. The arms may look shorter on the CG art, but that's because of the angle its presented at. —AscendedAlteran 18:51, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * It does look smaller. And if you argue that's because of the angle, I already thought about that and it doesn't make the perception better. Bronx01 02:09, July 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Maybe its because I have a thing against the CG art policy that we have using and fanart in general (for the main images), but I'm with Bronx on this one. I've always had the fear of the possibility that the fanart may get things wrong even if its accurately depicted. The official lineart is always the safest and best way to go IMO when it comes depiction and Wikia should stick to that as best as possible. Not that the fanart may not be accurate, just that official lineart is usually the best way to present something. It doesn't have to be in 3D to best represent something (even the anime itself is in 2d), and I already haver a problem with the different shades of color that the 3d models tend to use when compared to the official linearts or the designer lineart; I can usually accept it if its either sanctioned by Sunrise or came from the actual designer but less so if its from a fan (at least when it comes to representing a main image for an article. I can see no better candidate than either the Designer or the Anime linearts for such a role).


 * It actually can be because of the angle depicted (infact I think its likely), but Bronx's argumement has put enough doubt in me combined with my prevalent opinion for me to form my vote and I vote for using the official lineart. Sure one can always debate about the anime and designer linearts about which one is best used, but either of them would be favorable to a fan depiction when it comes to the accuracy department and I think its better to be safe than sorry.-SonicSP 20:14, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

I'll be away for a while btw. So if you want to add more (convincing points, opinions, etc.) input into this, please continue your discussion in Talk:GNX-Y901TW Susanowo. Thanks Bronx01 02:09, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Likely Error
Why did you add Dearka's mother as "Eileen Canaver"?

That is impossible as it conflicts with anything I've ever reasearched and her appearance conflicts with the formula used in SEED for child-parent relationships. Please give me accurate and concrete proof. Until then I am deleting (and will continue) that particular information from both Dearka's and Eileen's pages.

Knifeless 22:50, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Please reply promptly.


 * ROFL I didn't add it. Go to History at the top of Dearka's article and go search who added it and ask him/her.
 * If you REALLY want to remove it, just do it.
 * Bronx01 22:54, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

^__^;
Actually, it was another user that directed me to you. I'm to lazy to keep running around. Seeing how you replied in proper English, I can see it wasn't you.

My appologies (yeah, can't spell that)

Knifeless 23:12, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

hey Bronx01, 00 raiser condenser type is actually called GN-0000RE+GNR-010. Is ture!!!!!!!!!

hey Bronx01, 00 raiser condenser type is actually called GN-0000RE+GNR-010. Is ture!!!!!!!!! Gundam meister 14:00, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Recent Exia edits
You recently removed some new passages to Exia's article. While the passages were redundant, please try to take a moment and leave a comment if you are undoing an entire edit, or bring it up in the talk page. Thanks. --Nkuzmik 15:56, September 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it is redundant, so I doubt writing about it in the talk page/comment could do anything. However, I am writting comments whenever I can. Thanks for the reminder. --Bronx01 17:00, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

widths
the what now? which uc template? character mobile suit? link me to an example. S im A nt 03:02, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't type px after the size in the template, it is automatically added. S im A nt 11:48, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Ribbons' profile
Bronx, I was going to try and condense Ribbons' character section down to about a paragraph. I understand that you have put a massive amount of time and effort for people to try and understand Ribbons and how his personality was a major factor in the events of 00 and I commend you for that. However, I personally feel that, in the grand scheme of things, a few of the points you make about Ribbons are repeated throughout his profile. So, basically, here's my condensed versionof what you wrote. Feel free to read it.

Test Paragraph:Personality & Character
Overall, Ribbons was egotistical, manipulative, charming, ignorant, self-confident and prideful. Prior to the beginning of Season 1, Ribbons was a programmed Innovade designed to serve under the aegis of Aeolia Schenberg's plan. While Ribbons followed his given role, he began to notice the many flaws within human nature. Realizing that if humanity changed and evolved, Innovades like himself would become disposable tools. Ribbons began to detest his pointless existence until he witnessed the eyes of an awestruck boy in the Republic of Krugis. Ribbons then used the boy's admiration as an influence for his self-given purpose: to become God and lead a conflict ridden humanity to salvation under his control. With this in motion, Ribbons set about orchestrating his plan, manipulating and "guiding" people, using them as means to his own end of ultimate superiority. As being the first Innovade, Ribbons saw himself as being greater than all beings. He looked at humanity with a negative eye, believing that humans would always crave war and conflict, thus never being able to understand each other. However,his native outlook on humanity led him to being ignorant of those who had come to understand each other through words and eventually led to his downfall.

So, there it is.Gaeaman788 23:29, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Translations for Articles!
I'm sorry but I cannot read Japanese and I assumed that someone would eventually get to those articles and translate them, all I could do was to provide them. If I could translate them I would, but I cannont, it'd be best to find someone to translate them or another website that can, so we can add more to the pages about the characters. Dav7d2 22:48, October 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's ok. I didn't remove the pictures you added. I just put them in the pic gallery at the moment. --Bronx01 22:52, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

y did you delete my page?

Dude this is a Gundam Wiki, NOT a Gunpla Wiki. The MG 00 Qan[T] isn't important for the Wiki. There doesn't need to be a Page for it! Also please sign your name next time! Dav7d2 03:01, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

I have a question....
what are you doing to all the Gundam 00 mobile suit pages? Dav7d2 15:43, November 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Just adjusting some looks/formats in the articles. --Bronx01 15:46, November 20, 2010 (UTC)